<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Linux on Roads Less Taken</title><link>https://goran.krampe.se/categories/linux/</link><description>Recent content in Linux on Roads Less Taken</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://goran.krampe.se/categories/linux/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Ubuntu Just Works</title><link>https://goran.krampe.se/2014/10/30/ubuntu-just-works/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://goran.krampe.se/2014/10/30/ubuntu-just-works/</guid><description>&lt;p>A friend of mine is having a less optimal experience with Linux, and I realized I could jot down my experience for the last few years.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I have been using Linux on my desktop for a long time now, about 10 years I think. Early I played &amp;ldquo;distro jumping&amp;rdquo; and used &lt;a href="http://www.lunar-linux.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lunar Linux&lt;/a>
 for quite some time on my older Zepto laptop.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>But at some point I just decided that, nah, source distros are huge time sinks. Not necessarily because they have issues, but because they are fun to tinker with. I also felt it was &amp;ldquo;smarter&amp;rdquo; to know a mainstream Linux well, so I decided to go for &amp;ldquo;least friction&amp;rdquo;, and moved to Ubuntu. When Unity hit I did contemplate using something else, at least an alternative shell, but decided to just &amp;ldquo;hang in there&amp;rdquo;, and now I tend to like it. Recently I upgraded to &lt;a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/desktop/developers" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ubuntu 14.04 LTS&lt;/a>
, it was pretty eventless.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Going virtual from CLI</title><link>https://goran.krampe.se/2013/01/21/going-virtual-from-cli/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://goran.krampe.se/2013/01/21/going-virtual-from-cli/</guid><description>&lt;p>Recently when I automated a development process I looked deeper at managing virtual environments and ended up using two really nice tools complementing &lt;a href="http://www.virtualbox.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">VirtualBox&lt;/a>
 in a slick way - &lt;a href="http://www.vagrantup.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Vagrant&lt;/a>
 and &lt;a href="https://github.com/jedi4ever/veewee" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Veewee&lt;/a>
. A lot of us use VirtualBox of course, but getting a new Ubuntu box up is still a bit of blablablabla&amp;hellip; What if it could be done &lt;em>all from the command line and easily automated&lt;/em>?&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>HyperDex on Ubuntu 12.10 from source</title><link>https://goran.krampe.se/2013/01/16/hyperdex-on-ubuntu-12.10-from-source/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://goran.krampe.se/2013/01/16/hyperdex-on-ubuntu-12.10-from-source/</guid><description>&lt;p>So ok, I really like looking at new interesting NoSQL databases. Up until yesterday I felt &lt;a href="http://basho.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Riak&lt;/a>
 was the most interesting one (have also coauthored &lt;a href="http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~gokr/Phriak" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Phriak&lt;/a>
 - a Riak binding for &lt;a href="http://www.pharo-project.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pharo Smalltalk&lt;/a>
) but after an evening of discussing choices of key/value backends for the &lt;a href="https://goran.krampe.se/categories/oak" >Oak&lt;/a>
 project I decided to &amp;ldquo;google a bit&amp;rdquo; and stumbled upon &lt;a href="http://hyperdex.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">HyperDex&lt;/a>
.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>New SSD for my Lenovo X220</title><link>https://goran.krampe.se/2013/01/10/new-ssd-for-my-lenovo-x220/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://goran.krampe.se/2013/01/10/new-ssd-for-my-lenovo-x220/</guid><description>&lt;p>After the &lt;a href="https://goran.krampe.se/2013/01/02/ssd-nightmare" >conundrum with my Intel 320 SSD&lt;/a>
 I did some googling and decided to invest a fair chunk of money in a really good SSD - the &lt;a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/6328/samsung-ssd-840-pro-512gb-review" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Samsung 840 Pro, 512GB&lt;/a>
. The 840 Pro seems to be the king of the hill right now and it&amp;rsquo;s only 7mm thick which is what I need for my X220 (although people have shoved 9mm drives into it with a bit of force).&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Never an Intel SSD again</title><link>https://goran.krampe.se/2013/01/02/never-an-intel-ssd-again/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://goran.krampe.se/2013/01/02/never-an-intel-ssd-again/</guid><description>&lt;p>When I bought my Lenovo X220 - which I have been &lt;strong>extremely pleased with&lt;/strong> to date - I chose an &lt;strong>Intel 320 160Gb SSD&lt;/strong> disk with it, in retrospect a &lt;strong>BAD MISTAKE&lt;/strong>. No idea why I didn&amp;rsquo;t find the warnings plastered all over the net at the time, and the problem was even acknowledged by Intel &lt;a href="http://www.techpowerup.com/149064/Intel-Acknowledges-SSD-320-Series-8-MB-Bug-.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">as early as july 2011&lt;/a>
. The disk has been working fine since april when I got it, until the last day of 2012&amp;hellip;&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>